Saturday, May 11, 2013

The corruption of Children


Each and every system that depends on the future generations tries to make an impact on the young who will one day be the main workforce of society. The threat towards the faith is a major issue as major building blocks of society either 1)Teach things contrary to the faith, 2)Demand an end to faith, 3) Teach a corrupt version of the faith. And what better way is there to destroy the faith than by teaching it wrongly?

It is indeed difficult for children growing up today to make decisions when it comes to their faith in Christ and his Church, as on the one hand they are presented with a belief which demands strong faith which is balanced with reason, whilst on the other hand they are told that reason is the only means of acquiring knowledge and with that knowledge faith is not required. In actual fact, it is to be avoided at all costs.

  It is the case that those between the ages of 12-19 (sometimes even older) who had received the  faith from their parents, either no longer practice that faith or have a difficult time accepting it. They want to believe but deep inside they feel that  something is prohibiting them from that full communion. They feel ashamed to be abandoning something that as children they loved so much and believed so much and so easily without question, but even that now begins to pose difficulties for them as they begin thinking that the lack of questioning they did as children was due to their idiotic childish state, and that they must grow out of it to grow up and be what the world wants them to be.

Still there remains a battle within many, they want to grow up and do adult things but deep within, just as they experience feelings against the faith, so they experience feelings for the faith. The depth where these feelings originate are uncertain, but it is surely deep within the human framework in a place untraceable.

This interesting point brings us to a famous idiom which I'm sure you've heard at some point.
"You are what you eat"

Such a statement/idiom actually holds a lot of truth. In the physical nature of man we find the organs and biological make up of the human. The digestive system is where food is actually processed and absorbed.
At the bowels the food is fully absorbed and becomes part of the human. In the old Latin Mass (tridentine)
there used to be an ancient prayer which the priest recited just after he would consume the Eucharist:

"May Your Body, O Lord, which I have eaten, and Your Blood which I have drunk, cleave to the bowels of my very soul and grant that no trace of sin be found in me, whom these pure and holy mysteries have renewed. Who live and reign, world without end. Amen."

It is a fact therefore that Christ becomes one in us and us in him at the reception of his body. 
An atheist would argue that it is impossible to become part of Christ as Christ is non existent since the soul is non existent also. An argument used very often is that no scientist or doctor has ever encountered a soul within the human. But that is precisely the point! The most important things are often invisible, Just as electricity is invisible, so we see the light it emits. In medical procedures no doctor can locate a soul, just as no doctor can locate feelings or emotions but none the less just because we can't locate emotions or feelings does it mean they are non existent? 

Here therefore we can finally pinpoint as to the development of children into teenagers and the loss of faith they begin to experience. Their innermost being is already formed by the sacraments which cling to them as a holy stain which even the greatest evil could never remove. However the free will of man which God instilled in every human remains, untouched and unchanged by any sacrament. Strictly speaking a man could receive Holy Communion, walk out of Church and murder someone as soon as he exists the church. The whole focus here is that God will only act if the person allows him to act.

This is why today many teenagers end up loosing the faith which they really loved as children. As they receive communion they go back to their place, sit and dose off into wonderland rather than pray a communion prayer begging Christ to walk in and cleave to them and not let go.  Then comes the Thanks giving prayer after mass, which today is non-existent. Prayers of thanksgiving were a common sight after Mass, but went out the window together with the old Mass as the Hippie-guitar brigade demanded that it was an extremity leading to fundamentalism and that the mass was enough and people didn't need to say extra prayers after Mass.

If you attended a conference and were given a free blank cheque which you could cash for millions of Euros, would you not stay after the conference was over to thank the speaker who gave it to you?
With mass it's different surely, much different, because what we receive is not a blank cheque but Christ, the God man, the Trinity. Therefore how is it fundamentalism to remain after mass and thank God for the sacrament he has given to us? So complaining that the future generations are growing up to abandon the faith is partly due to the generation before them that is telling them that any extra prayer is fundamentalism.


Pray till the end of days, for the birds praise God by the flight they take to the skies and ends of the earth, so the sea creatures praise God in their moving through the waters, from the greatest depths of the Ocean to the shallowest of rivers, and so do the herds of animals running free over the earth praise God in their freedom, let man therefore who is created above all of these creatures, bow down to God and offer sacrifice day and night, let man walk with  God at each moment of his life, because it is with God for eternity that man will live, face to face with his creator.

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

The clowns that Hijacked the faith

The remarkable changes that took place within the Church over the past 50 years could be compared to an atomic bomb which exploded right at the centre of Rome. Those who often attack the Church demanding she catch up with the modern world have no clue what they're saying, as they surely haven't seen the changes that have indeed taken place and have gutted the Church of her prestige and glory.

After having fasted from Midnight, the average Catholic family would walk into church on a Sunday morning, each member holding a missal. They would genuflect as a sign of respect towards God held in the Tabernacle and find their way into a pew and kneel for several minuets to pray the prayers of preparation before Mass. Sung Mass lasted two hours whilst low mass lasted around 25 minuets. All the faithful received Communion kneeling and directly into the mouth (hand communion was unthinkable). the priest and faithful all faced the same direction (toward East) which was an ancient custom to face the direction where Christ walked the Earth and where tradition holds, he will descend upon the Earth in Glory at the end of time.
No one complained that they couldn't "see the priests face" and the famous "he's giving us his back" wasn't even thought of. All that was clear to priest and faithful alike was the sense of worship as priest and laity faced East as the priest offered a sacrifice on their behalf.

The choir and schola would sing the parts of the mass written into chant centuries earlier thus praying in the same manner as our ancestors had prayed for centuries, with the use of the Latin language which was a prized trophy for the Church after she converted the Roman Empire. The Latin language also served as a sense of mystery between the priest and the people and allowed the people to participate in silence altogether focusing on the offering of the priest rather than the responses to prayers. The Church had prayed in this manner for centuries, until the 1960's when the Second Vatican Council was called. The council wasted no time in bringing immense change within a matter of months, and what had taken centuries to build was destroyed practically overnight. As Pope Emeritus BENEDICT XVI had stated when he was the Cardinal Ratzinger "The mistake of the council was that the old building was demolished and a new one built rather than building on the old." 

The divine providence of the Holy spirit guided the council fathers to try and make the correct decisions which many a time were taken, but in the aftermath of the Council chaos spread like wild fire. When the Council had asked that "Choirs be diligently promoted" we suddenly saw masses of guitar and drum banging hippies take to the churches with their neo-tribal noise. Where the council had asked for Latin to remain the norm for saying Mass, but the common language could be permitted, it was implemented the opposite way round with Latin becoming the exception, and what an exception it was as it was nearly obliterated from every church in the West.

There were those who begun wondering as to how these changes were allowed to take place such as priests who had always prayed one form of mass, were now introduced to a new form. Just to give an example; there was no directive whatsoever which came from Rome asking the priest to celebrate mass facing the people but suddenly it became the accepted norm. Those who wanted to promote it suddenly filled peoples mind with all sorts of ignorant comments such as the famous "It's rude for the priest to give us his back" and when those who wanted to retain the traditional form of celebrating mass came up with the fact that now the priest is facing the people but giving his back to the tabernacle, the liberal clown and Hippie brigade solved the problem by removing the tabernacle from the centre and literally throwing it onto the side somewhere. In many churches one had to literally LOOK FOR the tabernacle, and the words of Mary Magdalene are repeated again: "They have taken our Lord and I do not know where they have taken him"

The banalities which the sacrifice of the mass has been subject to are horrific and the list is as long as it is sad, surely many of it was planned by those liberals whose job it was and still is to subject the Church to embarrassing news. The Clowns of modernism have not only found favor with Popes and Cardinals but they seem to have caused a split in the Church between those who want to take their faith seriously and those who couldn't care less whether the faith was dead or alive. 

Indeed the faith has had it's fair share of Pocahontas women dancing half naked in the Church wearing nothing more than a Bikini, fostering the dance of Tchaikovsky's nut cracker whilst dawning a tutu in the temple of God.

























                                                                SO HERE YOU HAVE IT!!


       FROM THIS                                                                     TO THIS








Tuesday, May 7, 2013

The Resurrected blog

After having abandoned the blog due to important commitments I have decided to return to blogging for the sake of those who feel lost by the lack of teaching they are receiving from the Church today.
It's often the case with many of us that we frequent Holy Mass every Sunday (skipping out sometimes) and we leave the church feeling exactly the same as when we entered. If this is the case you're suffering from Catholic Caner. You're not alone. The majority of Catholics today suffer from Catholic Cancer, which is an illness that spreads in the person's soul due to the lack of spiritual immunity which is not present within them mainly due to the lack of teaching the person received (or rather failed to receive).

The Church today is in a state of utter chaos from the Sexual abuse problems and homosexual activity among clergy to the disastrous "performances" of new age liturgies. We often hear people state that the Church has always passed through difficult times and that this period of horror is fine when compared to the other challenges the Church faced. I say WRONG. Why are the modern day problems totally different to the ones the Church faced in the past. The answer is simple.

In the past the Church was faced with many attacks but all these attacks against her doctrine originated from outside, not within the Church. You might ask, but what about the heresy of 'Arianism' wasn't it accepted by many bishops in the beginning therefore also being an attack on the Church from within? Yes indeed Arianism was accepted for a brief period of time and there were many disputes among clergy at the time but the matter was soon cleared up and the profession of what the Church really teaches was reminded and
re-affirmed. Today's problems are far worse and on a larger scale.

Let us take as an example the Homosexual subculture that exists in the ranks of the clergy (all the ranks), it has existed for centuries and been frowned upon for centuries. In the past if certain members of the clergy suffered from homosexual tendencies, they had to seek out their lovers in secrecy, the same with heterosexual priests who fell into sin. After the horrors of the 1960's 'Sex Revolution' many convents, seminaries and houses of formation allowed their homosexual candidates to "explore their sexuality" as a healthy part of their development. This was an excuse to allow perverts to "run a muck" and jump into bed with each other.

The problems were noted by superiors and rectors alike but many allowed the problem to grow and spread as they didn't even think of it as a problem in itself. Concerned bishops ignored the problem, adopting a centuries old technique that had worked wonders for the Church in the past, the approach of "Silence".
They taught that if they ignored the problem it would go away. Had it been 1400 A.D that approach might have worked but after the '60's Sex Rev' nothing was really the same anymore including the Church. And the bishops were asleep whilst their flocks of sheep were surrounded by hungry wolves.

Not only did the problem 'not go away' but it grew and spread until thousands upon thousands of parents begun asking questions as to why their son's as altar boys weren't keen on serving Father X's Mass on Sunday, only to find out from their children years later that several years earlier they had been abused by Father X. Once again the bishops adopted the approach of silence, and simply shifted the priest to a different parish hoping that it would stop. Of course the problem only grew as more children fell prey to these men who were never meant to be entrusted with the priesthood in the first place.

Now comes the tricky bit. Notice how the modern mass media report on the stories on Sexual abuse by priests. They always use the term "pedophile priests." Why is that? And no it's not because they prey on kids. Surely you note how the media is promoting the Homosexual culture, even in television series now, it's almost become a media teleseries/soap opera tradition to insert a gay couple into the movie or what ever you want to call it. They hide mixed messages for children to unravel in their minds so that as they grow older, the next generation will be more open and accepting of homosexuality. Now we come back to the sex abuse business.

The Majority of sexual abuses which took place by "priests", or actually the majority of victims were those boys who were either going through puberty or had passed it, therefore between the ages of (13-17). Very few cases were reported where the abuses took place on children.(non-teens). With this evidence it is clear to note that the problem is not pedophilia but homosexuality in this case. And as heterosexual pervert would fall for the youthful look of a 15 year old girl, so a homosexual pervert would fall for the beauty of a 15 year old boy. The secular media (and it's hidden agenda) therefore ALWAYS refrain from even mentioning homosexuality when it comes to sexual abuse by priests as they do not want to link homosexuals to abusers, since they're trying to push the 'Gay culture.'


Do we continue discussing the problems within the Church at this point? Surely not in this article,  however more articles will be added in due time, and we ask people's input, by sending any questions you may have, which will be answered in posts/articles to come. You could choose to post anonymously or not.

God bless you for reading.